Car manufacturers have responded to Government’s decision to cut its plug-in car grant (PCiG) with a mixture of frustration and tweaked finance offers to maintain their March sales.
While Ford of Britain chairman Graham Hoare was quick to express his disappointment at the £500 drop in assistance to £2,500 and the lower £35,000 price cap (down from £50,000), brands with new alternative fuel vehicles on the cusp of eligibility for the revised scheme were quick to highlight ongoing savings.
MG pledged to maintain a contribution of £3,000 to EV buyers interested in its ZS EV SUV and MG5 SW EV to maintain earlier benefits, while Skoda and Citroen flagged the ongoing eligibility of their new-to-market Enyaq and C4 flagship EV models.
But across the market, AM understands that over 20 recently launched EVs will be impacted by the reduced buying incentive – potentially reducing their appeal to potential buyers.
One Skoda retailer told AM of his frustration at seeing the brand’s new Enyaq EV SUV increase in cost by £3,000 overnight for some customers.
The brand was quick to highlight that the Enyaq iV 60 Nav model, which delivers a WLTP combined range of 256 miles, remains eligible for the £2,500 grant.
However, the larger 82kWh model, which generates 204PS and a headline 333-mile range may now represent and disproportionate price hike.
The Stellantis brand introduced a £550 pricing reduction on the ‘Shine Plus’ trim level in a move that sees the eC4 range priced from £30,895 to £32,495 with the grant.
While using less precious materials which being CO2 penalties and cost implications at the production stage, the MX-30’s 35.5KWh battery delivers a reduced range of 124 miles, but a list price of £28,545 to £32,845.
Thomson said: “It’s a car with a medium range battery. People have a binary way of thinking about batteries and range. We are trying to add some nuance to the discussion. Just as a one-litre petrol engine isn’t appropriate for all people, neither is an EV with a large battery. There is a strong environmental argument about right-sizing.”
Hoare said the change of policy was “not conducive to supporting the zero emissions future we all desire”, adding: “Robust incentives – both purchase and usage incentives – that are consistent over time are essential if we are to encourage consumers to adopt new technologies, not just for all-electrics but other technologies too like PHEVs that pave the way to a zero emissions future.”